Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
https://unramlawreview.unram.ac.id/index.php/ulrev

Articles

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Unram Law Review(ULREV)

Legal Protection For Consumers On Withdrawal Of Fiduciary Objectives By Financing Companies Due To Covid 19 In Mataram City

DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v6i2.243
Submitted
May 20, 2022
Published
2022-10-30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to obtain the first description: legal protection for consumers for the withdrawal of fiduciary guarantee objects by finance companies due to Covid 19, and second: the role of the Mataram City Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) in resolving consumer financing disputes in Mataram City. This type of research is a normative and empirical law that examines legal materials and data. The approach used is legislation and concepts, then analyzed with qualitative description.

Legal protection for consumers for the withdrawal of fiduciary guarantee objects by financing companies due to covid 19. The government issues a Countercyclical policy through restructuring or credit relaxation for debtors with the potential to have difficulty fulfilling their obligations; however, suppose the restructuring effort does not result in a settlement. In the case, dispute resolution is carried out based on the clauses in the agreement or credit agreement signed by the parties.

The Mataram City BPSK resolving consumer financing disputes due to Covid 19 in Mataram City, has an essential role as a quasi-judicial institution in resolving consumer disputes out of court. This institution was born as a form of equitable distribution of justice for the community, especially consumers who have not had access to dispute resolution in the judiciary.

References

A. BOOK
Ahmadi Miru dan Sutarman Yodo, 2011. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Cetakan Ketujuh. Penerbit. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.
____________________________, 2008, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta,
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 20014.Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Penerbit PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Imron Rosyadi, 2017. Jaminan Kebendaan Berdasarkan Akad Syariah Aspek Perikatan, Prosedur Pembebanan, dan Eksekusi, Depok: Kencana:
JanusSidabalok, 2012. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Lalu Husni, 2010, Hukum Penempatan dan Perlindungan TKI, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Lukman Santoso Az dan Yahyanto, 2016. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Malang, Setara Press,
Mukti Fajar ND dan Yulianto Achmad, 2013. “Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris”, Cetakan I Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar. Yokyakarta.
Yusuf Shofie, 2002, Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Menurut Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen (UUPK), Teori dan Praktek Penegakan Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2017. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta Kencana Persada Media Group.
Salim, HS, 2012. “Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak Di Luar KUHPerdata”, Penerbit. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.
______, 2004, “Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia”, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,
Susilowati S Dajaan, 2016. “Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen”, Universitas Terbuka, Cet.2, Tangerang Selatan,
Zulham, 2013. “Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen”, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta,
B. JOURNAL
Muhammad Maksum, 2015. Penerapan Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kontrak Pembiayaan,Jurnal Cita Hukum, Volume 3. Nomor. 1.
C. LAW
Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Nomor 350/MPP/12/2001 tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang BPSK.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor:18//XVII/2019 Tentang Pengujian Undang-UndangJaminan Fidusia
Perkap No. 8 tahun 2011 Tentang Pengamanan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia.
D. WEBSITE
Aida Mardatillah, “Mahkama Konstitusi Tafsirkan Cidera Janji dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia”,https://www.hukum online.com/berita/baca/lt5e13345852149/mk-tafsirkan-cidera-janji-dalameksekusi-jaminan-fidusia/, diakses pada tanggal 10 Maret 2020.
https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/debt-collector-di-mataram-rampas-mobil-milik-ibu-hamil.html diakses pada tanggal 2 Maret 2022.
https://www.suarantb.com/bpsk-sesalkan-masih-ada-penarikan-paksa-kendaraan-di-tengah-covid-19/diakses pada tanggal 2 Maret 2022
LEX JOURNAL: KAJIAN HUKUM & KEADILAN, P-ISSN: 2581-2033: http://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/hukum 2021-12-17. diakses pada tanggal 2 Maret 2022. UMS Library http://eprints.ums.ac.id/91382/ diakses pada tanggal 2 Maret 2022