Articles
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): Unram Law Review (Ulrev)
Analysis of Lawsuit Against the Factual Action which Conducted by Military after Law Number 30 Year 2014 Concerning Government Administration
Abstract
The enactment of law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration has caused a paradigm shift under development of state administration decision (in short term known as KTUN). By virtue of article 87 of Law number 30 year 2014, KTUN was not only on the written form, but it can also be a factual act. This causes a change in the absolute competence of lawsuit on factual actions taken by the government from the district administrative court (PTUN). It is arises a question whether Article 87 of Law number 30 year 2014 also applies to claims for factual actions committed by the military. The formulation of problems in this research are 1) The position of a lawsuit against factual actions committed by the military before Law number 30 year 2014 and 2) the claim position against factual actions committed by the military after Law Number 30 Year 2014. This research is a doctrinal research by using a statute approach and conceptual approach. The result of the analysis found that the KTUN paradigm have change under Law number 30 year 2014, which does not affect the absolute competence of lawsuits for factual actions carried out by military, though a government were excluded as mentioned on Article 2 of Law Number 9 of 2004 on Amendments of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court. It was confirmed under Article 87 of Law 30/2014, which grammatically states that the only changes to the KTUN are those in Law 51/2009, Law 10/2004, and Law 5/1986. The application of lex specialist pictured under the act number 30 year 2014 which regulated the administrative decision by the government, however concerning the military only regulated under the act number 31 year 1997. Further, the absolute competence on handling the legal factual action by the military since the implementation of law number 30 year 2014 is still held in the district court.
References
Books with an author:
Achmad Ali. (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Jakarta: Kencana.
Eddy O.S. Hiariej. (2015). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi, Yogyakarta, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, p.417.
L.J.Van Apeldoor.(1993).Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Pt Pranandya Paramita.
Muhamad Adiguna Bimasakti. (2018). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Oleh Pemerintah/Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad 9OOD) Dari Sudut Pandang Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Yogyakarta: Deepblish.
Muhamad Rakhmat. (2014). Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Bandung: Logoz Publishing.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Philipus M. Hadjon, dkk. (2005). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Gadjah Mada University Press: Yogyakarta.
R.Abdoel Djamali.(1998). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Yos Johan Utama. (2014). Pengertian Administrasi Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.
Journal articles:
Abdul Fatah. (2013). “Gugatan Warga Negara Sebagai Mekanisme Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara”. Yuridika, 28(3), p.293-303.
Aleksandra Cislak dkk. (2016). “Power Corrupts, but Control Does Not: What Stands Behind the Effects of Holding High Positions”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(6), p.944-957.
Erni Agustina. (2009). “Prospeksi Peradilan Tata Usaha Militer dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia”. Jurnal Hukum, Edisi Khusus p.187-189.
Hari Sugiharto dan Bagus Oktafian Abrianto. (2018). “Upaya Administratif Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat”. Arena Hukum, 11(1), p.24-47.
Nur Asyiah. (2016). “Eksitensi Perlindungan Hukum Warga Negara Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah Dalam Membuat Keputusan Administrasi Negara”. Samudra Keadilan, 1(1), p.44-54.
Nur Asyiah. (2016). “Kedudukan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia”. Pro Justitia, 1(1), p.63-75.
Ray Robinson. (1984). “Restructuring the Welfare State: An Analysis of Public Expenditure”. Journal of Social Policy, 15(1): 1-21
Tubagus Muhammad Nasarudin. (2016). “Asas dan Norma Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Pembuatan Instrumen Pemerintahan”. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 7(2), p.139-154.
Xavier Nugraha dan Ave Maria Frisa Katherina. (2019). “Tanggungjawab Promotor Perseroan Terbatas Terhadap Kontrak Pra Inkorporasi di Indonesia”. Media Iuris, 2(1), p.127-157.
Yuristyawan Pambudi Wicaksana. (2018). “Implementasi Asas Ius Curia Novit Dalam Penafsiran Hukum Putusan Hakim Tentang Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka”. Lex Renaisssance, 3(1), p.86-108.
Legislation:
Law Number 31 Year 1997 concerning Military Justice
Law Number 51 Year 2009 Concerning Second Amendements to Law Number 5 of 1986 about Administrative Judiciary
Law Number 30 Year 2014 Concerning Government Administration
