Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
https://unramlawreview.unram.ac.id/index.php/ulrev

Articles

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Unram Law Review(ULREV)

Projections And Problems of Land Registration Through A Complete Systematic Land Registration (Ptsl) Policy (Study At BPN Mataram City)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v8i2.375
Submitted
October 17, 2024
Published
2024-10-30

Abstract

The author can describe the aim of this research as follows: first: To get a complete picture of the projected implementation of land registration through Complete Systematic Land Implementation (PTSL) at BPN Mataram, second: To get a complete picture of the problems faced in implementing the land registration program through Systematic Land Implementation Complete (PTSL) at BPN Mataram. This type of research is normative and empirical legal research that examines legal materials and data. The approaches used are a legislative approach, a conceptual approach and a sociological approach. The technique for collecting legal materials and data is using literature studies and interviews. After the legal materials and data have been identified, the next stage is processing by systematizing them, then reasoning logically and systematically using qualitative descriptive analysis and drawing conclusions deductively.

The projected implementation of land registration through Complete Systematic Land Implementation (PTSL) at BPN Mataram is carried out to provide legal certainty and legal protection to land owners and avoid disputes and disputes in the future which is carried out free of charge for the community. This program began in 2017 and will end in 2025. The land plots targeted for 2022, 2023 and 2024 have met each year's target with a total of 2,076 land plots mapped. Problems faced in implementing the land registration program through Complete Systematic Land Implementation (PTSL) at BPN Mataram include internal factors such as the lack of availability of Facilities and Infrastructure and Certificates Issued Before Complete Mapping of the System, while external factors include a lack of community initiative to register, and the community has difficulty in prepare application files and proof of land ownership (Alas Hak).

References

  1. Books:
  2. Ahmadi Miru dan Sutarman Yodo. (2011). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Cetakan Ketujuh.
  3. Jakarta PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. (2008). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta Rajawali Pers.
  4. Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. (2014). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja
  5. Grafindo Persada..
  6. Imron Rosyadi. (2017). Jaminan Kebendaan Berdasarkan Akad Syariah Aspek Perikatan, Prosedur Pembebanan, dan Eksekusi. Depok: Kencana:
  7. Janus Sidabalok. (2012). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
  8. Lalu Husni. (2010). Hukum Penempatan dan Perlindungan TKI. Malang: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Brawijaya.
  9. Lukman Santoso Az dan Yahyanto. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, Mukti Fajar ND dan Yulianto Achmad. (2013). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan
  10. Empiris, Cetakan I . Yokyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  11. Yusuf Shofie. (2002). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Menurut Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen (UUPK), Teori dan Praktek Penegakan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
  12. Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Persada Media Group. Salim, HS. (2012). Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak Di Luar KUHPerdata. Jakarta: PT.
  13. RajaGrafindo Persada
  14. . (2004). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Susilowati S Dajaan. (2016). “Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Cet.2 Tangerang Selatan:
  15. Universitas Terbuka.
  16. Zulham. (2013). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
  17. Journal Artikel:
  18. Muhammad Maksum. (2015). Penerapan Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kontrak Pembiayaan, Jurnal Cita Hukum, Volume 3. Nomor. 1.
  19. Law:
  20. Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
  21. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
  22. Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Nomor 350/MPP/12/2001 tentang
  23. Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang BPSK.
  24. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor:18//XVII/2019 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia
  25. Perkap No. 8 tahun 2011 Tentang Pengamanan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia.
  26. Website:
  27. Aida Mardatillah, “Mahkama Konstitusi Tafsirkan Cidera Janji dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia”,https://www.hukum online.com/berita/baca/lt5e13345852149/mk-tafsirkan- cidera-janji-dalameksekusi-jaminan-fidusia/, diakses pada tanggal 10 Maret 2020.
  28. https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/debt-collector-di-mataram-rampas-mobil-milik-ibu-
  29. hamil.html diakses pada tanggal 2 Maret 2022.
  30. https://www.suarantb.com/bpsk-sesalkan-masih-ada-penarikan-paksa-kendaraan-di-tengah- covid-19/diakses pada tanggal 2 Maret 2022
  31. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan, P-ISSN: 2581-2033: http://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/ index.php/hukum 2021-12-17. diakses pada tanggal 2 Maret 2022. UMS Library http://eprints.ums.ac.id/91382/ diakses pada tanggal 2 Maret 2022.