Legal Certainty and Procedural Justice: Execution in Girik Land because Due Diligence Negligence

Authors

  • Janeva Hutauruk Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Rani Sri Agustina Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Nuryati Solapari Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v10i2.542

Keywords:

Legal Certainty, Due Diligence, Procedural Justice, Girik Land, Judgement Enforcement

Abstract

This study examines PT. Intan Plaza Adika's failures in conducting due diligence during girik land transactions and their consequences for legal certainty, while assessing whether the enforcement of the court's judgment satisfied the principles of procedural justice. A normative legal methodology was employed, integrating statutory, case law, and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal four distinct due diligence failures: non-compliance with the customary "terang" (open and transparent) requirement, inadequate verification of the seller's legal capacity as an heir, failure to uncover prior encumbrances on the girik land by third parties, and the absence of consent from all rightful heirs. These failures rendered the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement void ab initio, as it rested upon a legally defective title, reducing PT. IPA's legal certainty to a mere illusion. Regarding judgment enforcement, Indonesian civil procedural law provides the derden verzet mechanism and upholds the audi et alteram partem principle; however, their effectiveness hinges upon adequate prior notification to affected parties. This study recommends strengthening tiered ownership verification by notaries and land deed officials, alongside civil procedural law reform establishing clear standards for enforcement notification and criteria for postponing judgment enforcement upon prima facie evidence of legitimate legal interests, thereby restoring public trust in the judiciary and advancing SDG 16

References

Arief, Anggreany, and Azwad Rachmat Hambali. “UPAYA HUKUM PERLAWANAN PIHAK KETIGA ( DERDEN VERZET ) TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM YANG TELAH BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP ( IN KRACHT VAN GEWISJDE ) Third Party Legal Remedies ( Derden Verzet ) Against The Judge ’ s Ruling Which Has Incredible” 6, no. 1 (2023): 7–12. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v6i1.3853.

Askar. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Beritikad Baik Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah.” Journal of Lex Theory ( JLT ) 3, no. 7 (2022): 16–32.

Fathona, Cici, and Fauziah Lubis. “Analisis Strategi Hukum Dalam Mempercepat Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Hakim Perdata.” Judge : Jurnal Hukum 05, no. 02 (2024): 48–54.

Harnowo, Tri, and Alavi Ali. “PENDEKATAN KEADILAN INTEGRATIF DALAM MEMBANGUN INSTITUSI PUBLIK YANG LEGITIM.” JURNAL HUKUM & PEMBANGUNAN 51, no. 3 (2021): 720–42. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no3.3131.

“Het Herziene Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Pasal 195 Ayat (6) Jo. Pasal 206,” n.d.

Karjoko, Lego, Abdul Kadir Jaelani, and Jaco Barkhuizen. “THE POLITICS SETTLEMENT OF LAND TENURE CONFLICTS DURING JOKOWI ’ S PRESIDENCY.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 2 (2022): 487–524.

Khayru, Rafadi Khan, Arif Rahman Putra, and Didit Darmawan. “DUE DILIGENCE AND RISK MITIGATION FOR WINNERS OF COLLATERAL LAND.” Ureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 5, no. 3 (2025): 4104–22. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.863.

Latiful, T, Marlia Sastro, and Herina Wati. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Yang Beritikad Baik (Studi Putusan Nomor 67/Pdt/2015/PT BNA).” Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 11, no. 2 (2023): 381. https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v11i2.12132.

Nugrahenti, Meydora Cahya, and Ari Hernawan. “Good Faith Principle in Indonesian Contract Law: How to Set the Definition and Its Benchmarks.” Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development 8, no. 10 (2024): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.7358.

Pulumoduyo, Nur Faliza. “Menakar Konsistensi Asas Audi et Alteram Partem Dalam Putusan Verstek Perdata Elektronik : Tantangan Dan Solusi Hukum Progresif.” Judge : Jurnal Hukum 06, no. 03 (2025): 740–54.

Puteri, Shintiya Permata, and Asmarani Ramli. “Kepastian Hukum Letter C Sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Tanah Dalam Perspektif PP Nomor 18 Tahun 2021.” Jihhp 5, no. 5 (2025): 3761. https://dinastirev.org/DOI:https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Putra, Najuasah Manfarisyah Ramziati. “LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST RESISTANCE TO EXECUTION PARTIJ VERZET REGARDING EXECUTION CONFISCATION ( STUDY.” Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 12, no. 1 (2024): 13–25.

Ritonga, Syarifah Hasna, Muhammad Yamin, Zaidar Zaidar, and Suprayitno Suprayitno. “Implementasi Asas Nemo Plus Juris Terkait Perbuatan Hukum Atas Tanah Di Hadapan PPAT (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2678 K/ PDT/ 2015).” Journal of Law & Policy Review 1, no. 2 (2023): 198. https://doi.org/10.34007/jlpr.v1i2.372.

Rumawi, Christina Bagenda, Firzhal Jiwantara Arzhi, Ade Basri Darmawan, Rasdiana, Yusep Mulyana, Barzah Latupono, et al. HUKUM ACARA PERDATA. Pertama. Bandung: WIDINA BHAKTI PERSADA BANDUNG, 2021.

Said, Dede Hafirman. HUKUM ACARA PERDATA TEORI DAN PRAKTIK. Edited by Dede Hafirman Said. Pertama: CV. Merdeka Kreasi Group, 2021.

Sinaga, Benny Gabriel, Pristika Handayani, and Alwan Hadiyanto. “Peran Preventif Notaris Dan PPAT Dalam Pencegahan Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Preventive Role of Notaries and PPAT in Preventing Land Sale Disputes Prosedur Formal Melalui Pembuatan Akta Autentik Di Hadapan PPAT Sebagaimana Diatur.” Jurnal USM Law Review 9, no. 2 (2026): 950–52.

“SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 05 Tahun 2014 TENTANG РЕМBЕRLAKUAN RUMUSAN HASIL RAPAT PLENO KAMAR MAHKAMAH AGUNG TAHUN 2014 SEBAGAI PEDOMAN PELAKSANAAN TUGAS BAGI PENGADILAN,” n.d.

“SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 07 Tahun 2012 TENTANG Rumusan Hukum Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan,” n.d.

“SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 TENTANG PEMBERLAKUAN RUMUSAN HASIL RAPAT PLENO KAMAR MAHKAMAH AGUNG TAHUN 2016 SEBAGAI PEDOMAN PELAKSANAAN TUGAS BAGI PENGADILAN,” n.d.

Syamsudin, M. “Keadilan Prosedural Dan Substantif Dalam Putusan Sengketa Tanah Magersari ( Kajian Putusan Nomor 74/PDT.G/2009/PN.YK).” Jurnal Yudisial 7, no. 1 (2016): 11.

Syarifuddin, Zubaedi, Rosikhu. “Konstruksi Perlindungan Hukum Untuk Pembeli Tanah Beritikad Baik : Analisis Dan Solusi Praktis.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 5, no. 9 (2024): 1–24. https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/.

Vennacia, Veronica, and Ompu Mona. “AKIBAT HUKUM TRANSAKSI AKTA JUAL BELI TANAH GIRIK DESA CIDOKOM MELALUI PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH ( SEMENTARA ) DI WILAYAH KECAMATAN GUNUNG SINDUR,” 2024, 67–74.

Werdhi Wahari, Ni Putu Diah Anjeni, and I Gusti Agung Mas Rwa Jayantiari. “Pengaturan Girik Dan Implikasi Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pembuktian Hak Atas Tanah.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 19, no. 3 (2022): 433. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v19i3.946.

Widiyono, Try, and Zubair Kasem Khan. “Legal Certainty in Land Rights Acquisition in Indonesia ’ s National Land Law.” LAW REFORM 19, no. 1 (2023): 128–47.

Widya, Adinda, Isabel Lamasigi, and Antonius Youngky Adrianto. “Evaluasi Yuridis Atas Pengaturan Pembeli Beritikad Baik Dalam SEMA No . 4 Tahun 2016 : Upaya Penguatan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah.” Jurnal Jatiswara 40, no. 3 (2025): 320–32.

Yusuf, Andi M Reyza, and Yenni Yunithawati Kurniati, Nia Rukmana. “NASIONAL DAN PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH.” ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan 7, no. 2 (2024): 271–89.

Published

30-10-2026

How to Cite

Janeva Hutauruk, Rani Sri Agustina, & Nuryati Solapari. (2026). Legal Certainty and Procedural Justice: Execution in Girik Land because Due Diligence Negligence. Unram Law Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v10i2.542

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.