From Exception to Last Resort: Reconstructing “Very Urgent Reasons” in Child Marriage Dispensation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v10i2.541Keywords:
Best Interests Of The Child, Child Marriage Dispensation, Reconstruction, Very Urgent ReasonsAbstract
The absence of clear normative parameters for determining “very urgent reasons” in marriage dispensation cases creates broad judicial discretion and may result in inconsistent decisions and inadequate protection of children’s rights. This study aims to examine judicial interpretation of “very urgent reasons” and reconstruct the concept through a child-centered normative framework that provides clearer parameters for judicial decision-making. This study employs doctrinal legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by prescriptive analysis to identify, evaluate, and reconstruct the relevant legal norms. The findings demonstrate that the minimum marriage age constitutes the rule, while marriage dispensation represents an exception that should only be considered when objective, unavoidable, and urgent circumstances make marriage the only proportionate means of protecting the child. A personal relationship, sexual intercourse, the desire to marry, and family consent do not, by themselves, establish a very urgent reason. Based on these findings, the study develops a Child-Centered Urgency Test comprising five dimensions: urgency, alternatives, child autonomy, responsible readiness, and best interests. The framework shifts judicial inquiry from whether there is a reason to marry toward whether marriage at a particular time is demonstrably necessary for the child’s protection. It provides a structured basis for limiting judicial discretion and positioning marriage dispensation as an exceptional judicial remedy rather than an alternative pathway to underage marriage.
References
Abdullah, Sintiarawati. “Judge’s Considerations in Granting the Request for Marriage Dispensation.” Estudiante Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2023): 273–81. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v5i2.21486.
Amrullah, Thoriq Rahmat, and Muhsan Syarafuddin. “Integrasi Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Dalam Dispensasi Kawin : Analisis Yurisprudensi Atas Alasan Khawatir Zina Di Pengadilan Agama.” USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 7, no. 1 (2026): 315–36. https://doi.org/10.46773/jrydt769.
Arkanbariq, Anantya Aliyya. “Antinomy of Multiple Interpretations of Very Urgent Reason in The Marriage Dispensation in Indonesia.” Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective 4, no. 1 (2024): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.12928/adlp.v4i1.9379.
Ashari, Hasan. “REKONSTRUKSI PERTIMBANGAN ALASAN SANGAT MENDESAK PADA PERKARA DISPENSASI KAWIN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 12, no. 2 (2024): 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v18i2.3389.
Aziz, Abd Aziz Tambunan, Abdul Rahman Hamid, and Sanusi Sanusi. “Typology Of Urgent Reasons And Child’s Best Interests In Marriage Dispensation At Indramayu Religious Court.” Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 16, no. 2 (2026): 83–85. https://doi.org/10.22373/jkp4sp72.
BS, Akmal Hakim, Muslim Zainuddin, Muhammad Iqbal, Muhammad Yusuf, and Erha Saufan Hadana. “Assessing Judges’ Considerations of Urgent Grounds in Marriage Dispensation Decisions: A Case Study of the Jantho Sharia Court, Aceh, Indonesia.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 8, no. 2 (2025): 1000–1020. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v8i2.27101.
Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. “Rekap Data Jenis Perkara Dispensasi Kawin Peradilan Agama,” 2026. http:/kinsatker.badilag.net/JenisPerkara/perkara_persatker/362/2025.
Fadli, Wan Ferry. “Summoning Absent Defendants in Divorce Cases: Fast, Simple, and Low-Cost Justice.” Melayunesia Law 9, no. 1 (2025): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.30652/rptdj326.
Fitria, Rizal Arif, Ahmadi Hasan, and Masyithah Umar. “DISPENSASI KAWIN DAN PEMENUHAN HAK ANAK : STUDI PENGARUH TERHADAP HAK-HAK ANAK DALAM KONTEKS.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence,Economic and Legal Theory (IJIJEL) 1, no. 4 (2023): 749–67. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.201.
Hamid, Abdul, Syukri Iska, and Sri Yunarti. “Tinjauan Filosofis Terhadap Perubahan Batas Usia Perkawinan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019.” Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 1 (2021): 16–26. https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v19i1.899.
Hasibuan, H. A. Lawali, and Alvin Hamzah Nst. “HAKIKI, METODE PENAFSIRAN HUKUM SEBAGAI ALAT MENCARI KEADILAN.” Jurnal Legisia 15, no. 2 (2023): 136–45. https://doi.org/10.58350/leg.v15i2.351.
Kok, Maryse C, Tasneem Kakal, Abeje Berhanu Kassegne, Irwan M Hidayana, Alister Munthali, J Anitha Menon, Paulo Pires, Tabither Gitau, and Anke Van Der Kwaak. “Drivers of Child Marriage in Specific Settings of Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia – Findings from the Yes I Do! Baseline Study.” BMC Public Health 23, no. 1 (May 21, 2023): 794. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15697-6.
Kurniawan, M Beni, and Dinora Refiasari. “DALAM PENOLAKAN PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN: Kajian Putusan Nomor 0127/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Kr.” Jurnal Yudisial 15, no. 1 (2022): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i1.508.
Liem, Andrian, Very Julianto, Kamsi Kamsi, Arini Haq, Raydinda Laili Shofa, and Kamilatissa’Adah Kamilatissa’Adah. “Factors Associated with Child Marriage during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia.” Contemporary Islam 18, no. 3 (August 11, 2023): 457–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-023-00545-6.
Mashdurohatun, Anis, Sri Kusriyah, and Ahmad Rofiq. “Reconstruction of Marriage Dispensation Regulations in the Perspective of Human Rights Based on the Value of Justice.” Sch Int J Law Crime Justice 6, no. 4 (2023): 225–33. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2023.v06i04.005.
Muammar, Muammar, and Iqbal Taufik. “Quo Vadis Penelitian Hukum : Sebuah Jalan Meluruskan Miskonsepsi Kecenderungan Arah Penelitian Hukum Quo Vadis Legal Research : A Path to Straighten Out Misconceptions About Legal Research Trends.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 7, no. 2 (2024): 2–10. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.7917.
Naghizadeh, Somayyeh, Mojgan Mirghafourvand, Azam Mohammadi, Marzieh Azizi, Saba Taghizadeh-Milani, and Hadiseh Ganbari. “Knowledge and Viewpoint of Adolescent Girls Regarding Child Marriage, Its Causes and Consequences.” BMC Women’s Health 21, no. 1 (July 3, 2021): 119–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01497-w.
Purbayu, Faisal, Sutisna Sutisna, and Hambari Hambari. “Analysis Of Marriage Dispensation Case Decisions In Bogor Regency: Review Of Law And Social Aspects.” MIZAN: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW 12, no. 2 (2024): 157–167. https://doi.org/10.32832/mizan.v12i2.20382.
Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad. “Penafsiran Pembentuk Undang-Undang Membentuk Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Presidential Threshold Dalam Undang-Undang Pemilihan Umum Yang Bersumber Dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal RechtsVinding 11, no. 1 (2022): 153–72. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.867.
Tewahido, Dagmawit, Alemayehu Worku, Amare W Tadesse, Hanna Gulema, and Yemane Berhane. “Adolescent Girls Trapped in Early Marriage Social Norm in Rural Ethiopia: A Vignette-Based Qualitative Exploration.” PLoS ONE 17, no. 2 (July 3, 2022): e0263987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263987.
Wiranata, Nopan, Ismail Ismail, and Alimni Alimni. “Tinjauan Hukum Perkawinan Islam Berdasarkan Sejarah Pembentukannya.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 5, no. 2 (2023): 318–27. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v5i2.15623.
Yetta, Yasin, Ahmad Rajafi, and Syahrul Mubarak Subeitan. “Understanding the Implications of Marriage Law Amendments: Marriage Dispensation Cases in Indonesian Religious Courts.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (May 21, 2024): 121. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i1.8979.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yunita, Sri Turatmiyah, Muhammad Syaifuddin, Erisa Ardika Prasada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder by Author
