Implentation Of Ijon System In Livestock Trading In Sasak Local Traditional Community (Study In Gelanggang Village, East Sakra District, East Lombok Regency)

Authors

  • Masyhur Universitas Gunung Rinjani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v10i1.490

Keywords:

Sasak Indigenous Community, Ijon Trading, Legal Protection

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the implementation of ijon (pawn-purchase) trading within the Sasak indigenous community of Lombok and to analyze the legal protection regarding such practices. The research method employed is a normative-empirical approach, utilizing several methods: the statute approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that: First, the ijon system in Lombok is a traditional pledging system involving the exchange of assets for a promise of future payment at a higher value. This system emerged as an alternative for people with limited access to formal financial institutions. Beyond meeting urgent financial needs, ijon also possesses a business dimension where the lender profits from the price difference. Second, the practice of the ijon system strongly contradicts universally applicable legal principles. Despite being a customary practice among the Sasak people in Gelanggang Village, East Lombok, transactions using the ijon system are legally declared invalid and have the potential to disadvantage one of the parties involved. This is because the system does not meet the requirements for a valid agreement.This reseach aim to find out the implementation of ijon (pawn-sale) trading in Sasak lombok indiginous community and to determine legal protection for ijon (pawn-sale) trading. This reseach use normative empirical method with statute aprroach, conceptual approach and case approach. The result of this studi find that: first, ijon system in Lombok is a traditional pawn system which involves an asset exchanges with a promise of a higher repayment in the future. This sytem arise as an alternative for society member who has limited acces to formal finance institution. In addition to fullfill urgent financial needs, ijon also has business dimension in which the lender derives profit from the price difference. Second, ijon system practice contrary to the universal legal principles. Eventhough, this sytem already become Sasak comunity customary in Gelanggang Village, East Lombok, under the law, ijon transaction may declare invalid and may potentially cause harm to one of the parties involved. This is due to the sytem does not satisfy the requirement of a valid agreement.

References

Moch. Isnaeni. 2015. Perjanjian Jual Beli . Bandung : PT Revka Petra Media

Salim HS 2003. Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak . Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Triyana dan Wandi. 2018. “Tinjauan Hukum Jual Beli Menurut Hukum Perdata”, Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen . Vol 2, hlm. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/das-sollen.v3i1

Wijaya, F. 1991. Kredit & Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Kita . Penerbit : BPFE Yogyakarta

Subekti, R, dan R. Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata), Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2003.

Indonesia. (1960). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1960 tentang Perjanjian Bagi Hasil Produksi . Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia 1960 Nomor 2. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Masyhur. (2026). Implentation Of Ijon System In Livestock Trading In Sasak Local Traditional Community (Study In Gelanggang Village, East Sakra District, East Lombok Regency). Unram Law Review, 10(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v10i1.490

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.