Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Unram Law Review(ULREV)

Settlement of Criminal Offences Based on Victim Recovery and Protection Through the Village Krama Assembly (A Study in Sesait Village, North Lombok District)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v8i2.367
Submitted
September 30, 2024
Published
2024-10-30

Abstract

This research aims to explore the case settlement mechanism through MKD, specifically examining the forms of recovery and victim protection provided by MKD. This empirical legal study adopts a socio-legal approach and employs case studies. The findings reveal that the criminal case resolution process through MKD starts with a report, followed by verification and the scheduling of a meeting by MKD. A mediation process then takes place, where if the parties agree to reconcile, MKD drafts a peace deed. If not, minutes are prepared, and MKD advises the parties to pursue formal legal channels. In terms of victim recovery and protection, particularly in domestic violence cases, during mediation, the victim is kept separate from the perpetrator to prevent further violence, intimidation, or third-party intervention. Should reconciliation be reached, a peace deed is drawn up, stipulating that if the perpetrator repeats their actions, litigation will follow immediately. This approach serves to deter future offenses and safeguard victims. Given the Sesait village community's strong adherence to customary law, perpetrators who sign a peace deed are also subject to traditional sanctions imposed by tau loka empat. These sanctions aim to restore relationships between the parties and reintegrate harmony within the community. The sanctions not only reduce the stigma surrounding the perpetrator but also provide support to the victim. Thus, the recovery concept in the Sesait community extends beyond the victim to include the perpetrator and the broader community.

References

  1. Books:
  2. Nurjaya, I Nyoman. Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Dalam Perspektif Antropologi Hukum. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, 2008.
  3. Kusumohamidjojo, Budiono. Kebhinekaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Suatu Problematik Filsafat Kebudayaan. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo, 2000.
  4. Rada, Arifin. Peranan Hukum Adat Larvul Ngabal Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Pada Konflik Horizontal Di Kepulauan Kei. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya, 2010.
  5. Journal articles:
  6. Apriani, Nadia Ayu, and Hadi Hadi. “Perlindungan Hukum Saksi Dan Korban Penganiayaan Oleh Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban.” Justicia Sains Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v5i2.1287.
  7. Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhammad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020): 20–33.
  8. Bontot, I Nyoman. “Konflik Pada Desa Adat Di Bali : Masalah Dan Solusi Penyelesaiannya.” Belom Bahadat, 2023. https://doi.org/10.33363/bb.v13i2.1042.
  9. Ginting, Yuni Priskila. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dengan Melibatkan Tokoh Adat/Pemangku Kepentingan: Sebuah Pendekatan Restoratif.” Jurnal Locus Penelitian Dan Pengabdian, 2024. https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v3i3.2531.
  10. Komariah, Mamay. “Perlindungan Hukum Saksi Dan Korban Oleh Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban (Lpsk).” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 2015. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v3i2.421.
  11. Muhammad, Muhammad. “Inheritance Dispute Settlement through Mediation with the Bale Mediasi of East Lombok.” LAW RESEARCH REVIEW QUARTERLY 8, no. 4 (2022): 427–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v8i4.61691.
  12. Murdiyambroto, Debi Triyani. “Penyelesaian Kasus Tersangka Odgj Melalui Restorative Justice.” Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 2023. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v2i9.3505.
  13. “Policy Paper Perlindungan Hukum Melalui Jalur Non Litigasi Bagi Masyarakat Adat,” 2023. https://doi.org/10.30641/kumhampress.90.
  14. Rahmi, Atikah. “Pemenuhan Restitusi Dan Kompensasi Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Bagi Korban Kejahatan Seksual Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia.” De Lega Lata Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2019. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v4i2.3173.
  15. Saputra, Rian, Josef Purwadi Setiodjati, and Jaco Barkhuizen. “Under-Legislation in Electronic Trials and Renewing Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia (Comparison with United States).” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 8, no. 1 (2023): 243–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.67632.
  16. Zurnetti, Aria, and Nani Muliati. “Customary Criminal Law Policy on Domestic Violence Settlement through Restorative Justice.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2090083.