Criminal Liability in Environmental Crimes Committed by Corporations after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 at Indonesia

Authors

  • Fitriani Rahmadia Diponegoro University
  • Hari Sutra Disemadi Diponegoro University
  • Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya Diponegoro University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v4i1.86

Keywords:

Corporate Responsibility, Environmental Crime

Abstract

Corporations are organized groups of people and / or properties, both in the form of legal entities or non-legal entities. In relation to the corporation as a legal subject in environmental crime, it is formulated in Article 1 number 32 of the Law Number 31 Year 2009 about Environmental Protection and Management, each person is an individual or business entity, both legal entities and non-legal entities. The context of corporate crime in the environment is still not solid enough to ensure corporations in criminal sanctions because there is no legal basis regarding the procedures for handling environmental crimes committed by corporations. The Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Corporate Crime provides a basis for enforcement of criminal law, then the purpose of writing this article is to find out the form of criminal liability for corporations for environmental crimes and legal consequences after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2013.The type of research used is legal research which is included in the normative legal research typology where this study focuses on positive legal norms in the form of legislation. The theory used by the author in analyzing is using the theory of criminal liability which is based on the principle of legality. The conclusions include: criminal sanctions that can be applied to corporations based on Article 4 of Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 are in the form of criminal fines, additional crimes, and disciplinary actions except prisons and confinement. Last, the legal consequences of the application Article 25 Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 with the principal criminal is a criminal fine and then the criminal added according to the law governing environmental criminal acts is the Law Number 32 Year 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management.

References

Abdul Roup, Muridah Isnawati and Sudarto. (2017). “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016”, Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 1(2): 294-322, < DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v1i2.1163>.

Amiad Kushner. (2003). “Applying The Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine Outside The Public Welfare Context”, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 93(2): 681-712.

Hariman Satria. (2017). “Penerapan Pidana Tambahan Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup”, Jurnal Yudisial, 10(2): 155-171, < DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v10i2.18>.

Hari Sutra Disemadi and KholisRoisah. (2019). “Urgency of the Contempt of Court Criminalization Policy to Overcome Harassment Against the Status and Dignity of Courts” Brawijaya Law Journal, 6(2): 224-233, < DOI: http://dx.doi.org/>.

Idi Amin. (2018). “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup”, Jurnal Ius Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 6(2): 259-263, < DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i2.558>.

Hari Sutra Disemadi and Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. (2019). “Perkembangan Pengaturan Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti, 3(2): 118-127, < DOI: https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i2.80>.

Kristian. (2014), “Urgensi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi”, Hukum dan Pembangunan”, Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 44(4): 575-621, < DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol44.no4.36>.

Muh Abdul Qudus and Pujiyono. (2019). “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Human Trafficking Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 5(2): 26-39, < DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.18237>.

Muladi and Dwidja Priyanto. (2012). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Koorporasi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip.

Oksimana Darmawan. (2018). “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia” Jurnal Yudisial, 11(2): 171-192, <DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i2.292>.

P. Joko Subagyo. (2005). Hukum Lingkungan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Rusdianto Pratama. (2015). “Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Lingkungan Serta Pertanggungjawabannya Ditinjau Dari Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia”, Lex Crimen, 4(2): 105-116.

Remy Sjahdeini, Sutan. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Jakarta: Gfitipers).

Yudi Krismen. (2014). “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Kejahatan Ekonomi”, Jurna lIlmu Hukum Riau, 5(1): 133-160, <DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v4i1.2089>.

Zul Akrial and Heni Susanti. 2017, “Analisis Terhadap Korporasi Sebagai Subyek Didalam Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup”, UIR Law Review, 1(2): 137-148.

Regulations:
Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016
Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management
Law Number 23 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management
Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Eradication Act
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law

Downloads

Published

2020-03-27

How to Cite

Rahmadia, F., Disemadi, H. S., & Putra Jaya, N. S. (2020). Criminal Liability in Environmental Crimes Committed by Corporations after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 at Indonesia. Unram Law Review, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v4i1.86

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): Unram Law Review (Ulrev)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Fitriani Rahmadia, Hari Sutra Disemadi, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright holder by Author

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.