Articles
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Unram Law Review (Ulrev)
History of the Arrangement of Contempt of The President in Indonesia
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Mataram
Magister of Law of Faculty Law Mataram University
Magister of Law of Faculty Law Mataram University
Magister of Law of Faculty Law Mataram University
Abstract
This research aimed to find out the existence history of the Article on the arrangement of contempt of the President or vice President in Indonesia from the old order (orde lama), new order (ordebaru) to reformation era. Type of this research is normative legal research under conceptual approach which studied literatures through library research. The collected materials were processed and analyzed qualitatively with deductive thinking method. Research result indicates that the regulation on contempt of the President and vice President in Orde Lama andOrdeBaru era were accordingly to the Dutch colonial era. The regulation was terminated in the reformation era through the decree of the Supreme Court No.013-022/PUU-IV/2006 since it considered contradict the constitution 1945 (UUD 1945). Furthermore, contempt of the President and vice President regulated under Article 207 KUHP or Article 310-312 in term of the President or vice President regarded as ordinary civilian excluded their privileges as the law and human rights guaranteed each citizen’s equation before the law.
References
Aditya Septian Wicaksono, Sularto, dan Hasyim Asy’ari, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Formulasi Perbuatan Pencemaran Nama Baik Presiden Sebagai Perlindungan Simbol Negara”, Diponegoro Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2 Tahun 2016, http://www.ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index. php./dir/
Dimyati, Khudzaifah.2005.Teorisasi Hukum: Studi tentang PerkembanganPemikiran Hukum di Indonesia 1945-1990. Surakarta : Muhammadiyah University Press.
Mardjono Reksodiputro,Tentang Penghinaan Kejahatan Negara, Jakarta: Elsam,2003
Pan Mohamad Faiz,Pencabutan Pasal Penghinaan Presiden, Presiden Tanpa Perisai, http://jurnalhukum. blogspot.co.id/2006/12/pencabutan pasal penghinaan Presiden.html, diakses tanggal 23 Januari 2019.
Yulia Kurniaty, Agna Susila, dan Heni Hendrawati, “Unsur-Unsur Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Online (Kajian Putusan Perkara Dengan Terdakwa Florence Saulina Sihombing)”, The 5th Urecol Proceeding, ISBN 978-979-3812-42-7.
Indonesia, Undang-undang Dasar Pasal 1 ayat (3) Tahun 1945
Soesilo, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana, Pustaka Buana.
Putusan MK No. 013-022/PUU-IV/2006.
Website;
Nasrullah., Sejarah Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia,2016, https://www.academia.edu/8459153/Sejarah-Sistem-Hukum-Indonesia-Pada-Pra-Kemerdekaan-dan-Masa Kemerdekaan, diakses tgl 25 Januari 2019
Widya Suryani Widayati, 2017, Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Terhadap Presiden Atau Wakil Presiden: Perlukah Diatur Kembali Dalam Kuhp , https://www.Researchgate.net./Publication/327864268-Tind ak-Pidana-Penghinaan-Terhadap-Presiden-Atau-Wakil-Presiden-Perlukah-Diatur-Kembali-Dalam-Kuhp-Defamation-Against-The-President-Or-Vice-President-Should-It-Be-Regulated-In-The-Criminal-Code, diakses tgl 26 Januari 2019
