Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Unram Law Review (Ulrev)

People’s Power Policy in Legal Construction in Treason Criminal Law as Indonesian Penal Code Reform

DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v4i2.116
Submitted
June 13, 2020
Published
2020-10-23

Abstract

Last year, People’s power was sounded during the presidential election period. It is still reaped the pros and cons in various circles, some called it as part of the treason, and some categorized it as a form of freedom of expression. The purpose of this article to see if the legal construction of treason criminal law is regulated under the current Penal Code, people’s power can be categorized as treason and how people’s power policies should be in the future under the legal construction of treason under criminal law.  the normative point of view with the statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach, analyzing the concept of people’s power is not appropriate to calls as a criminal act of treason because it does not meet the juridical construction of treason under the Article 104, Article 106, and 107 of the penal code(KUHP). Likewise, in Article 191 Indonesian Penal Code Bill (RKUHP), Article 192, Article 193, and 194 RKUHP. People’s power policy in the legal construction of treason criminal law as an effort to reform the Penal Code needs to be reformulated in particular articles, later in Article 194 ofthe penal code(KUHP). The legal construction of treason criminal law then emphasized in words against the government without using the weapons.

References

Books:
Adami Chazawi. (2002). Kejahtan Terhadap Keamanan Dan Keselamatan Negara. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Moeljatno. (1983). Hukum Pidana Delik-Delik Percobaan Dan Delik-Delik Penyertaan. Jakarta: PT. Bina Aksara.

Journal Articles:
Abdurisfa Adzan Trahjurendra. (2014). Politik Hukum Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Makar Di Indonesia”, Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, 1(2): 1-20,.

Ahmad Rofiq, Hari Sutra Disemadi, and NyomanSerikat Putra Jaya. (2019). “Criminal Objectives Integrality in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System”, Al-Risalah, 19(2): 179-190.

Anggara. (2017). “American Intervention In The Overthrow Of President Ferdinand E”, Historical, 1(1): 116–130.

Anshari. (2018). “Delik Terhadap Keamanan Negara (Makar) Di Indonesia (Suatu Analisis Yuridis Normatif Pada Studi Kasus Sultan Hamid II),” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(3): 457–505.

Asiyah Jamilah, and Hari Sutra Disemadi. (2020). “Pidana Kerja Sosial: Kebijakan Penanggulangan Overcrowding Penjara”, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 8(1): 26-38.

Astri C. Montolalu. (2016). “Tindak PidanaPercobaan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)”. Lex Crimen, 5(2): 75-81.

Bekti Cikita Setiya Ningsih. (2020). “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Makar Pada Gerakan People Power Tanggal 17 April 2019", Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 26(7): 869-881.

Blasius Mau Kau, Hari Sutra Disemadi, and YusriadiYusriadi. (2020). “Membangun Keadaban Politik Pengakuan Dalam Upaya Meredam Isu Agama”, Jurnal Yustisiabel, 4(1): 57-67.

Candra Ulfatun Nisa, Hari Sutra Disemadi, Kholis Roisah. (2020). “Aspek Hukum Tentang Black Campaign Pada Platform Media SosialInstagram”, Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 5(1): 1-21.

Devi Febriyanti. (2016). “Signifikansi Surat Kabar Kompas Dalam Pemberitaan Peristiwa Reformasi 98,” Avatara, 4(3): 1156–1170.

EmanSulaeman. (2019). “Crime of Makar and Its Enforcement in Post-Reform Indonesia”, Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 1(1): 49-84.

Erdianto Effendi. (2019). “Makar Dengan Modus Menggunakan Media Sosial”, Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum, 1(2):1-13.

Fanny Fauzie. (2019). “Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat Dimuka Umum Sebagai Makar Menurut KUHP”, Alhurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 4(2): 205-220.

Fauzan Hamsyah Permana, EkoSoponyono, and R. B. Sularto. (2017). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Makar Di Indonesia”, Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4): 1-11.

Lani Sujiagnes Panjaitan et al,. (2016). "Penerapan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Makar Oleh Organisasi Papua Merdeka (Opm) Di Kabupaten Jayawijaya (Studi putusan nomor 38/Pid. b/2011/Pn. Wmn)", USU Law Journal, 4(3): 88–98.

Lusy Asa Akhrani et al., (2020). “Kekacauan Pemilu 2019: Fenomena Firehose of Falsehood Dalam Relasi Sikap Terhadap HOAX Dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Komisi Pemilihan Umum,” Jurnal Transformative 6(1): 1–27.

Marthsian Yeksi Anakotta, Hari Sutra Disemadi, and Kholis Roisah. (2020). “From Youth for 74 Years of Independence of the Republic of Indonesia (Masohi Militancy: Youth Efforts to Eradicate Radicalism And Terrorism)”, Jurnal Hukum Prasada, 7(1): 53-60.

Nicholas Henry. (2011). “People Power: The Everyday Politics of Democratic Resistance in Burma and the Philippines,” Thesis: Victoria University of Wellington.

Prianter Jaya Hairi. (2017). “Judicial Review Pasal-Pasal Makar KUHP: Perspektif Penafsiran Hukum Dan Ham (Judicial Review on Treachery Articles of the Criminal Code: The Perspective of Law Interpretation And Human Rights),” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 8(2): 235–253.

Puteri Rezki Manan. (2017). “Pengaruh People Power Dalam Suksesi Kepemimpinan Di Mesir”, Thesis: Universitas Hasanuddin.

Sahuri Lasmadi, Ahmad Rofiq, Hari Sutra Disemadi, and Sholahuddin Al Fatih. (2020). “Islamic Criminal Law Review on the Duality of Principles of Legality in the Draft of Indonesia Criminal Law Code”, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(2): 942-958.

Shafira Elnanda Yasmine. (2015). Arab Spring : Islam Dalam Gerakan Sosial Dan Demokrasi Timur Tengah Arab Spring : Islam within Social Movement and Democracy in the Middle,” Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 28(2): 106–113.

Siti Faridah. (2018). “Relevansi “Makar” dalam #2019 Ganti Presiden”, Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, 4(2): 238-249.

Widati Wulandari and Tristam P. Moeliono. (2018). “Problematika Pengertian Aanslag-Aanslag Tot En Feit: Perbandingan Makar Dalam KUHP, WvSNI Dan Sr.,” PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 4(3): 473–492.

World Wide Web:
BBC News. (2019). Orasi ‘people Power’ Pendukung Prabowo Disebut Makar, Polisi Represif?, Available from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-48244103, (Accessed April, 20, 2020).

Bimo Wiwoho. (2019). Prabowo, ‘People Power’ Dan Makar, Available from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190510131122-33-393705/prabowo-people-power-dan-makar, (Accessed May 10, 2020).

Husni Afriadi. (2017). AksiMakar Dan Kudeta Yang PernahTerjadi Di Indonesia, Available from https://www.covesia.com/news/baca/30938/aksi-makar-dan-kudeta-yang-pernah-terjadi-di-indonesia (Accessed May 9, 2020).

ICJR. (2017). MengembalikanMakna “Makar” DalamHukumPidana Indonesia, Available from https://icjr.or.id/mengembalikan-makna-makar-dalam-hukum-pidana-indonesia/ (Accessed April 10, 2020).

Media Indonesia. (2018). 1986: Awal Peristiwa People Power, Available from https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/146870-1986-awal-peristiwa-people-power (Accessed May 5, 2020).

Mehulika Sitepu. (2019). Pilpres 2019: Siapa Sebenarnya Pemilih Jokowi Dan Prabowo?, Available from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-47909130, (Accessed May 5, 2020).